Legal Opinion

Hellebrand v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 19, 1991No. 90-372VPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HARKINS, Senior Judge:

Petitioners seek review in the United States Claims Court of the special master’s July 23, 1991, decision, which found petitioners were ineligible for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (the Program) for the vaccine-related death of their daughter, Lacey Marie Hellebrand.1 Under the review stan*758dards, the court is authorized to set aside any of the special master’s findings of fact or conclusions of law found to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.2

Lacey Marie Hellebrand was bom on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Melissa Hines, on Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, Amber Sevier v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hellebrand ex rel. Estate of Hellebrand v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Widdoss v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Hellebrand v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API