Smith-Schultz-Hodo Realty Co. v. Henley-Spurgeon Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
•The counts claiming upon an award of arbitrators (Nos. 5 and 7) aver the existence of a controversy between plaintiff and defendant as to whether or not defendant was due plaintiff anything on account of a commission received by defendant in the sale of some property in Birmingham. There is nothing in them which could reflect upon the bona fides of such controversy, though appellee thus argues. The counts allege a submission to certain named arbitrators.
A submission to arbitration of a controversy, when followed by an award, has a distinct legal import and contains the essential features of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bernhardt v. CurtisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Craft v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Leftkovitz v. First National Bank of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Odum v. Rutledge & Julian RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Jos. Joseph. & Bros. v. Hoffman & McNeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glens Falls Ins. Co. of New York v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Republic Steel Corporation v. GilbertAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955