Legal Opinion

Markall v. Smithway MacHinery Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1949No. 30945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff, Maurice Markalí, and defendant Jose Lucientes are residents of California. Defendant O. P. Smith is, and for many years has been, a resident of Seattle, Washington.

Plaintiff instituted this action, alleging in his complaint that, March 12, 1945, he, as first party, and the defendants, as second parties, entered into a written contract (a copy of which is attached to the complaint), whereby the plaintiff agreed “to sell upon consignment” to the defendants, who agreed to purchase from plaintiff, a quantity of machinery, which was itemized in an exhibit attached to the contract. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Corneliusen's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Smith v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schrock v. GillinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. West Norman Timber, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Stansbury v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Schrock v. GillinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API