Legal Opinion

City of Darlington v. Kilgo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 1990No. 23213PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

*42This is an appeal of a summary judgment order granting respondents, City of Darlington, City of Hartsville (Cities) and other individuals who live in or near the Cities an injunction against appellants, the Darlington County Administrator and members of the Darlington County Council (County). We affirm.

Darlington County Council passed an ordinance creating a fire district which included all unincorporated areas of Darlington County. The County did not seek an agreement with the Cities prior to adopting this plan. The respondent Cities sued to enjoin implementation of the plan…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Myrtle Beach v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Darlington CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Darlington CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. City of Spartanburg v. County of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Comm'rs of Pub. Works of Laurens v. City of Fountain InnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  5. Mathis v. HairCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API