Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
People v. Luna-Solis
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 8, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 12SA75Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Bender
¶ 24 The majority holds that the district court erred in suppressing Luna-Solis’s statements under the Sixth Amendment. Maj. op. ¶ 16. I agree that the district court erred in its analysis, but I disagree with the majority’s ultimate conclusion. In my view, the district court correctly suppressed Luna-Solis’s statements because they were obtained in violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment and article II, section 7 of the Colorado Constitution when Denver detectives illegally expanded the scope of the Crim. P. 41.1 order by interrogating him.
¶ 25 The majority also holds that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.