Legal Opinion

Williams v. Artcraft Optical Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLapham, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for permission to discontinue this action upon the payment of taxable costs and disbursements.

The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant royalties and damages under a licensing agreement. The action was commenced *318in October, 1940, and issue was joined by the service of the answer on November fourteenth of the same year. No counterclaim was interposed in the answer.

The venue was originally laid in New York county, but on the application of the defendant the place of trial was changed to Monroe county on December 13, 1940, on the ground that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carleton v. . DarcyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Jermyn v. SearingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Rosen v. 981 Union Avenue Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laurentis v. BercowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Binder v. GrossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API