Legal Opinion

Bolles v. Dalton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petit ton, upon Gen. Laws, c. 75, s. 9, for leave to file a claim against the defendants for damage caused by a defective highway. The plaintiff omitted to file her claim within ten days, because she-did not know that the law required a claim to be filed.

1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.

A traveller receiving an injury from a defect of a-highway, and unavoidably prevented from filing his claim for damages within ten days, may apply to the court within six months, and if the court are of opinion that manifest injustice would otherwise be done, they may allow his claim to be filed. G. L., c. 75, s. 9. Any person aggrieved by a decision of a judge of probate, who was prevented from appealing therefrom within sixty days, through mistake, accident, or misfortune, and not from his own neglect, may, on petition within two years, be allowed an appeal. G. L., e. 207, s. 7. If, through…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. NorthwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  2. Kelsea v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  3. Boyd v. DerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
  4. Hendry v. North HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
  5. Page v. CamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API