Legal Opinion
Kiedaisch v. Nike, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 24, 2004No. CV-03-502-MPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Kiedaisch v . Nike, Inc. CV-03-502-M 02/24/04 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Gary Kiedaisch, Plaintiff v. Civil N o . 03-502-M Opinion N o .
2004 DNH 038
Nike, Inc.; Nike U.S.A., Inc.; Bauer Nike Hockey U.S.A., Inc.; Scott Olivet, and Mark Loomis, Defendants O R D E R In December of 2002, defendant Bauer Nike Hockey, U.S.A. (“BNH”), terminated plaintiff’s employment. Approximately three months later, plaintiff brought suit in state court, advancing eight common law causes of action: breach of contract; misrepresentation; breach of the implied covenant of good faith and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Danca v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Dubon-OteroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kenton Capital, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoover v. Harvard PilgrimDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016