Legal Opinion
Clark v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1969No. 2668PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
The claimant Clark sues his employer’s insurer for workmen’s compensation benefits. He appeals from the dismissal of his claim of residual disability.
*172Clark sustained a back injury on June 11, 1965. He was paid all medical expenses and workmen’s compensation through November 13, 1967, when he was discharged by his attending neurosurgeon as no longer disabled. The substantial issue is whether he has proved residual total disability beyond that date.
Although initially the diagnosis was disputed, Clark did sustain a ruptured inter-vertebral disc as a result of his work-accident. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ball v. American Marine CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Bourque v. Monte Christo Drilling CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Lee v. Royal Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mitchell v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Vidrine v. American Employers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Touchet v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Theriot v. Transit Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Jones v. Quick Shop Food StoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Malone v. YagerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974