Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1904PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the District Court of McLennan. Tried below before Hon. M. Surratt.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

C. B. Hall sued the plaintiff in error for himself, and as next friend of his minor son, Charles Hall, to recover for personal injuries sustained by Charles Hall, whose foot was crushed and mangled by a car in one of plaintiff in error’s trains, at a public crossing in the town of McGregor. The court, on the verdict of the jury, rendered-judgment against the plaintiff in error for Charles Hall in the sum of $2500, and for C. B. Hall in the sum of $500. The defendant pleaded contributory negligence upon the part of Charles Hall.

The plaintiffs’ petition substantially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MageeTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. O'NealTexas Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. English v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Fox v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API