Legal Opinion

Barrow County Cotton Mills v. Farr

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1925No. 16094PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

It is suggested in the brief of the attorney for the defendant in error that a demurrer to the petition was overruled, and that since no exceptions have been taken to that judgment, the petition stands as sufficient under the law of the case, and that, gauging the evidence accordingly, a verdict for the plaintiff would have been authorized. The defendant in error has not sought to have the demurrer and the judgment thereon included in the record, but, even assuming that a general demurrer to the petition was overruled without exception, we are still of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API