Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Fort Greene National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMat, J.

The court is constrained to give judgment herein for the plaintiff. Having been a minor at the time of the execution of the mortgage and of the conveyance mentioned in the complaint, she was incapable of releasing her dower rights in the real property of her deceased husband. (Sanford v. McLean, 3 Paige, 117; Bool v. Mix, 17 Wend. 119.) The mortgagee and grantee were chargeable with knowledge of her infancy and dealt with her, under the circumstances, at their peril. The fact that the mortgage and the deed may have been given for full consideration is immaterial, plaintiff’s inchoate right of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chipman v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Bool v. MixNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Sanford v. McLeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Bowers v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  5. James v. JamesNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crowe v. Fort Greene National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API