Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Glickman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1998No. Nos. 96-17054, 96-17055PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Robin Alexander’s application for food stamps was denied because her household owned a truck whose fair market value, above and beyond the $4500 allowed by the statute for a vehicle, exceeded the $2000 in household financial resources allowed by the Food Stamp Act. The district court held that the truck was an inaccessible resource under the Act because it was subject to hens exceeding its fair market value. The Secretary of Agriculture and state agencies appeal.
FACTS
Robin Alexander filed an application for food stamps for herself, her minor children, and Scott…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Philadelphia Gear Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Leslie A. Warren v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division of Social Services Michael Espy, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Valenzuela v. EspyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1993
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bay Area Addiction Research & Treatment, Inc. v. City of AntiochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- American Vantage Companies, Inc. v. Table Mountain RancheriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. LawallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.