Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Fritz Byers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Cincinnati Insurance Company (“CIC”) brought an action for legal malpractice against attorney Fritz Byers (“Byers”), alleging that Byers negligently failed to perfect an appeal from an Ohio state-court judgment entered against H.U. Tuttle & Sons, Inc. (“Tuttle”), an insured of CIC. The district court, on cross-motions for summary judgment, ruled in favor of Byers and entered judgment accordingly. The district court thereafter denied CIC’s motion for relief from operation of the judgment brought under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. CIC now…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Mary Hopper v. Euclid Manor Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Sheila L. Logan v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation Kellermeyer Building Services, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Wilfong v. BatdorfOhio Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Louis David Johnson, Jr. v. Unknown Dellatifa (03-1497/1880) Unknown Carline (03-1506/1865) S. Powers (03-1555/1833) Dave Stasewish (03-1559/1835)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Ronald C. Majewski v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Thomas E. Sutherland v. Michigan Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Painewebber, Inc. v. Alfred M. Cohen, of the Estate of Samuel GinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.