Legal Opinion

M'Nutt v. Dare

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1846PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

M‘Nutt and Cummins sued Dare in assumpsit for money had and received. Plea, the general issue. Verdict and judgment for the defendant;

Previously to the trial, Dare filed a bill in equity for a discovery against M‘Nutt and Cummins, alleging that the action at law was commenced for the recovery of a part of a sum of money, which M‘Nutt and Cummins affirmed they had advanced to Dare as their agent, for the purpose of purchasing for them a steam-engine, and which they claimed had not all been expended in the purchase; that Dare had received of M‘Nutt and Cummins 2,100 dollars, not as their agent,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boots v. CanineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Nave v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ager v. State ex rel. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Chambers v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API