Legal Opinion

Rafal v. Rafal

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 11, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

Plaintiff brought this action for specific performance of the monthly payment provision of her separation agreement with the defendant, her former husband. The defendant con*435tends both by way of defense and counterclaim that he was justified in reducing the monthly payments until such time as he has recovered the monetary value of certain property admittedly taken by plaintiff from the home which she vacated and which he and the children reoccupied under the terms of their agreement. Defendant relies upon paragraph 4 of the agreement, which reads:

“4. The parties shall retain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lewis Storage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  2. Marsh v. Union Pacific Railway Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1882
  3. Holmes v. FreemanConnecticut Superior Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Van Bibber v. NorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Maso v. MoralesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  4. Rafal v. RafalCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API