Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Clarke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*691An appellant is obligated “to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must include any relevant transcripts of proceedings before the Supreme Court” (Kruseck v Ross, 82 AD3d 939, 940 [2011]; see CPLR 5525 [a]; 5526; Gorelik v Gorelik, 85 AD3d 859, 860-861 [2011]; Kociubinski v Kociubinski, 83 AD3d 1006, 1007 [2011]; Schwartz v Schwartz, 73 AD3d 1156, 1156-1157 [2010]). The record must also “contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court, including the transcript, if any, of the proceedings” (Matison v County of Nassau, 290 AD2d 494, 494 [2002]).

Here, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matison v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Kruseck v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Schwartz v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Gorelik v. GorelikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Kociubinski v. KociubinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coello v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Castoria v. BrackerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Christopher RR. v. St. Lawrence County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Christopher RR. v. St. Lawrence County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Coello v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API