Goard v. Gunn

It appears that one Arthur Gunn bought out the saloon of plaintiff in error in the town of Salida, paying a part, and leaving the sum of $120 unpaid. Suit was brought to collect the amount. An attachment issued and levied upon the goods, stock and fixtures of the saloon as the property of Arthur Gunn. E. M. Gunn intervened, claiming to be the owner. A trial was had before a justice of the peace and a jury — verdict and judgment sustaining the attach-, ment; an appeal taken to the county court, trial to the judge without a jury, and finding for the intervenor. The correctness of such finding…