Legal Opinion

Dixie Fertilizer Co. v. Teasley

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery City Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. PEARSON. Action by the Dixie Fertilizer Company against C. B. Teasley, for the conversion of a bale of cotton. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

PELHAM, P. J.(1) The case was tried before the court without a jury, and if the judgment rendered can be supported by the evidence, the conclusions reached by the trial judge on the facts should not be disturbed on this review.—Montgomery Lodge v. Massie, 159 Ala. 437, 49 South. 231; Winter-Loeb Grocery Co. v. Mutual Warehouse. Co., 4 Ala. App. 431, and authorities cited on bottom of page 436, 58 South. 807.(2) The action was brought for the conversion of 10 bales of cotton, and a count was added by amendment for money had and received, and the case tried to a conclusion as if pleas of the gen*284…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Heflin v. SlaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Elmore v. Simon & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Gainer v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Winter-Loeb Grocery Co. v. Mutual Warehouse Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howton v. MathiasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. George D. Witt Shoe Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Moses v. BossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. Clifton v. CurryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API