Legal Opinion
Nathan Gardels v. Central Intelligence Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 28, 1982No. 81-1567PublishedCited by 282 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge:
We have to decide whether the District Court correctly upheld on summary judgment, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3), the Central Intelligence Agency’s refusal to confirm or deny thd existence of records pertaining to covert contacts for foreign intelligence purposes between the Agency and individuals at a specific university in the United States. Our answer is affirmative.
I
Because this court has already issued an opinion in this case which sets out the facts and prior proceedings in detail, Gardels v. Central Intelligence Agency, 637 F.2d 770,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Susan D. Goland and Patricia B. Skidmore v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Hayden v. National Security Agency/Central Security ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Harriet Ann Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency and George H. Bush, Director, Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Snepp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ellen L. Ray and William H. Schaap v. Stansfield Turner, Director Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by282 opinions
- The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Larson v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Wolf v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Cynthia King v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Central Intelligence Agency v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.