Legal Opinion

Domingo Roman v. Sunny Slope Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1987No. 85-2090PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

The appellant-plaintiff, a migrant farm-worker, was injured on the job and brought this action with claims under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (AWPA), 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq., and state common-law for battery and fraud. The plaintiff claims his injuries arose from being sprayed by pesticides while working in the defendant’s fields. The district court dismissed the complaint because it found that South Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Law, S.C.Code Ann. § 42-1-10 et seq. provided the exclusive remedy for all of plaintiff's claims. We affirm.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Garvin v. Alumax of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Stephen Robert Demko v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Ramsford Barrett v. Adams Fruit Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Domingo Roman v. Sunny Slope Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API