Legal Opinion

Filley v. King

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 15, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill in equity to obtain tbe title to certain real estate claimed to have been fraudulently conveyed; brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County, and heard before JEEovey, I. Facts found and judgment for the petitioner. Motion in error by the respondents. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

In 1865 Dan W. King, one of the respondents, then insolvent, purchased a piece of land and paid for it with money taken from his business, and caused the deed to be made to his wife, with the intention to defraud his then and subsequent creditors. On November 24th, 1869, he gave to the petitioner his promissory note for $4,547.13, payable at bank, to the order of the petitioner, two months from date, for merchandise. The note not being paid when due, the petitioner brought suit upon it on the 27th of February, 1870, and attached the land aforesaid and recovered judgment on March 16th, 1875;…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bassett v. McKennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  2. Newtown Savings Bank v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Quinnipiac Brewing Co. v. FitzgibbonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. Barbour v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API