Legal Opinion
Caruso v. State of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2005No. 04-35155Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL CARUSO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, an Oregon No. 04-35155 municipal corporation, by and through its County Commissioner, D.C. No. CV-03-01731-ALH Defendant, OPINION and STATE OF OREGON, Intervenor-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 3, 2005—Portland, Oregon Filed September 6, 2005 Before: Procter Hug, Jr., A. Wallace Tashima, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.