Legal Opinion

Howell v. Van Siclen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from taxation of costs, and an allowance. This action was originally brought by Alexander J. Howell against John S. Howell about November 12, 1872, to recover the amount of a promissory note, and also for rent. The said John S. Howell, having died during the pendency of the action, it was revived against Henry K. Van Siclen and William Joyce,, his executors.

Read the full summary

Appeal from taxation of costs, and an allowance. This action was originally brought by Alexander J. Howell against John S. Howell about November 12, 1872, to recover the amount of a promissory note, and also for rent. The said John S. Howell, having died during the pendency of the action, it was revived against Henry K. Van Siclen and William Joyce,, his executors. The defendants set up three counter claims and after reply served an amended answer, which also contained three counter claims, and was replied to. The case was referred to a referee to hear and determine. During the trial before…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court of Appeals affirmed the order of the general term and held as stated in the head-note. There was no opinion.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Hadley v. PethcalNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API