Legal Opinion

Bahil v. Scribner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 1979No. 79-3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

These seven appellants were, at various times, appointed as delinquent tax collectors in Pulaski County. As compensation until January 1,1977, they received certain fees based upon a percentage of the penalty imposed for delinquent taxes. Act 342 of 1941 (Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 84-1006 — 84-1010 [Repl. I960]). In April, 1977, appellee brought this taxpayers’ action contending that the compensation received by appellants from November 4, 1974, until December 31, 1976, was prohibited under Amendment 55 to the Arkansas Constitution. This Amendment was approved on November 4,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. RhotonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. MacKey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Martindale v. HoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Tedford v. MearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Newton, County Judge v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Munson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Munson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1986
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API