Mills v. Warn
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtFarris, J.
A single question is presented by this appeal: Whether the trial court properly granted a motion for mistrial because insurance was mentioned during the presentation of the plaintiff’s case, after the court had specifically instructed counsel to inform his witnesses that the term must not be mentioned again. It had been mentioned twice by a different witness before the admonishment. The defendant moved for a mistrial after the first two references, but withdrew the motion. The motion for mistrial was remade after the third incident. Barbara Jean Mills, mother of the minor plaintiffs, was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Williams v. HoferWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Anderson v. DobroWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- James v. RobeckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Hanson v. Newberry Renton Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kubista v. RomaineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Larson v. Georgia Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Reiboldt v. BedientCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Kubista v. RomaineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975