Curtis v. Moore
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This was a Writ of Error to tlie District Court of Ramsey County. The case originated before a Justice of the Peace, and was removed to the District Court by Writ of Certiorari. The judgment of tbe Justice was affirmed, and the Plaintiff in Error caused the Writ to be issued. The opinion of the Court contains a statement of the facts.
Read the full summary
This was a Writ of Error to tlie District Court of Ramsey County. The case originated before a Justice of the Peace, and was removed to the District Court by Writ of Certiorari. The judgment of tbe Justice was affirmed, and the Plaintiff in Error caused the Writ to be issued. The opinion of the Court contains a statement of the facts. The following are the points and authorities relied upon by the counsel for Plaintiff in Error: JBirst. — The Court below erred in sustaining the decision of the Justice on the motion to discharge the attachment. Case, Folios 17, 18,19, 20. Second. — The Court…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
—Atwater, J.
This was an action commenced by the Defendant in Error, in a Justice’s Court, in Bamsey County, by "Writ of Attachment, issued March 30th, 1859, and returned duly served same day, certain personal property of the Defendant having been attached by the constable. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict given for the Plain*32tiff, and j udgment rendered thereon for $51,00. The cause was removed to the District Court by certiorari, and the judgment of the Justice was affirmed. The Defendant then sued out a Writ of Error from this Court.
The Defendant movedbefore the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Tanner & Delaney Engine Co. v. Hall & MobleySupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- Folsom v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Stevens v. EarllMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Keigher v. McCormickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866