Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Ellis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Potter county. Hon. Loring B. Gaffy, Judge. Action on a nóte by Cassius C. Bennett, assignee for the benefit of creditors of the Pierre Savings Bank, of Pierre, S. D., against A. L. Ellis and Libbie J. Ellis. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

This action is upon a promissory note for $300 given by defendants to the Pierre Savings Bank, of -which the plaintiff is receiver, for the benefit of, creditors. A verdict was directed for plaintiff, and defendants appealed from the judgment rendered thereon.

Defendants’ answer is as follows: “Come now the above-named defendants, and, for answer to plaintiff’s complaint herein, deny each and every allegation, matter, fact and thing in plaintiff’s complaint contained. For a second, separate and independent defense, and for the.purpose of this defense only, the defendants allege that if any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Dakota Land & Live Stock Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burrows v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Green v. FrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Federal Land Bank v. SchleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Finnerud's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Midland National Life Ins. v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API