Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Tri-State Cattle Feeders, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1982No. C-1193PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the question of coverage under a theft insurance policy. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment for the insured, Tri-State Cattle Feeders, Inc. 628 S.W.2d 844. The application for writ of error by the insurance carriers is refused, no reversible error.

However, we disapprove the court of appeals invalidating the 24-hour notice of loss provision in the policy under authority of article 5546(a). 1 Article 5546(a) states in part:

No stipulation in a contract requiring notice to be given of a claim for damages as a condition precedent to the right to sue thereon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commercial Standard Insurance v. HarperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. HarperTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  3. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Tri-State Cattle Feeders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Betco Scaffolds Co. v. Houston United Casualty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. El Paso County v. Sunlight Enterprises Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2016
  4. American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Betco Scaffolds Co. v. Houston United Casualty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API