Legal Opinion
Montgomery County Council v. Summers
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 4, 1975No. [No. 131, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We shall here reinstate an assessment made by appellant, Montgomery County Council (the Council), for toad improvements in that county. The litigation apparently was produced by a basic misunderstanding of the formulae mandated by the code of that county for computation of such assessments.
The Council adopted an ordinance on November 10, 1970, assessing a portion of the cost of construction and reconstruction of Tilden Lane against land owned by appellees, A. Burks Summers et ux. (the Summers). The assessment was made pursuant to the authority of Montgomery County Code (1965), § 24-36…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leonardo v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Somerset County Sanitary Commission v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Milestone v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- County Council of Harford Co. v. Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Northampton Corp. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Montgomery County v. SchultzeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Sulzer v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- WOODMONT CC v. Mayor and City Council of RockvilleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996