State v. Mead
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
Indictment for larceny; Plea, not guilty. When the cause was called for trial, the defendant claimed the right to have the cause tried by the Court and not by a jury. The prosecuting attorney, on behalf of the state, objected to this claim-, and insisted upon having a jury impanelled to try the issue. The Court overruled the objection of the prosecuting attorney, tried the cause upon its merits without a jury, and acquitted the defendant.
We have no doubt but that this proceeding is unconstitutional and void. The language of the constitution of the state is, “ That in all criminal cases,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by15 opinions
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Joy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Todd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. RedmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.