Legal Opinion

State v. Mead

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1837PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ERROR to the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Indictment for larceny; Plea, not guilty. When the cause was called for trial, the defendant claimed the right to have the cause tried by the Court and not by a jury. The prosecuting attorney, on behalf of the state, objected to this claim-, and insisted upon having a jury impanelled to try the issue. The Court overruled the objection of the prosecuting attorney, tried the cause upon its merits without a jury, and acquitted the defendant.

We have no doubt but that this proceeding is unconstitutional and void. The language of the constitution of the state is, “ That in all criminal cases,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Joy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Todd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. RedmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  5. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API