Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Cleveland

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1957No. Civ. No. 22283Published

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

In this action for rescission of a sale of real property, and for other relief, upon the ground of fraud, judgment of nonsuit was for defendants and plaintiffs appeal.

Mr. and Mrs. Pierce owned a residence in Los Angeles County of the value of $10,500 but subject to a trust deed encumbrance of some $8,700. On September 25, 1954, they *445executed a grant deed which contained no description of the property or name of a grantee and delivered the same to William E. Cleveland, who was a real estate broker of their acquaintance. An agreement was signed at that time by Mrs. Pierce and Cleveland as set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Security Investment Co. v. BartramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Pacific Finance Corp. v. RoffalliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API