Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Mead Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2006No. 05-3707UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jack W. Simpson, Sr., appeals the denial of early retirement benefits upon termination from his employment with Defendant-Appellee Mead Corporation (“Mead”). Before us on appeal are the following issues: 1) whether the “Mead Management Income Parity Plan” (“1982 plan”), or the plan as amended in 1992, controls Simpson’s asserted entitlement to early retirement benefits; and 2) if the 1982 plan governs, whether Simpson is entitled to early retirement benefits. Because we find that Simpson is not entitled to early retirement benefits…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Derek Kramer v. Am. Electric Power Exec. Severance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  2. Deal v. Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter Co. LPADistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  3. Morrison v. Regions Financial Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
  4. Aldridge v. Regions BankDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
  5. Crawford v. Guaranty State Bank & Trust Company, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API