Simpson v. Mead Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Jack W. Simpson, Sr., appeals the denial of early retirement benefits upon termination from his employment with Defendant-Appellee Mead Corporation (“Mead”). Before us on appeal are the following issues: 1) whether the “Mead Management Income Parity Plan” (“1982 plan”), or the plan as amended in 1992, controls Simpson’s asserted entitlement to early retirement benefits; and 2) if the 1982 plan governs, whether Simpson is entitled to early retirement benefits. Because we find that Simpson is not entitled to early retirement benefits…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Derek Kramer v. Am. Electric Power Exec. Severance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Deal v. Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter Co. LPADistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Morrison v. Regions Financial Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Aldridge v. Regions BankDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Crawford v. Guaranty State Bank & Trust Company, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.