Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy Administration

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 8, 1979No. C-77-1209-CBRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

RENFREW, District Judge.

Plaintiff Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) filed this action on June 6, 1977 against the Federal Energy Administration (“FEA”), certain FEA officials, and Dennis Riley, a former lessee of an ARCO service station. In 1975 the FEA determined that the service station rent that ARCO was charging Riley exceeded the maximum rent permitted by FEA regulations. The FEA ordered ARCO to make refunds and grant credits to Riley to comply with FEA rent regulations. After ARCO made these payments, the Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals held in the case of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. RCA Global Communications, Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Contested Case of Surf & Sand Nursing Home v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State, Department of Corrections v. ChesnutDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API