Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Sicurella

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 8, 1951No. 21881_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTOS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

All three defendants were indicted for conspiring to violate the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312, which prohibits the transportation in interstate commerce of an automobile known to be stolen. The defendants Sicurella and Tomaselli were also indicted for the substantive offense of violating the Dyer Act. The defendants were tried and convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. Defendants now appeal.

None of the defendants testified. The evidence indicated the following:

On October 5, 1949, Sicurella and Bil-literi called on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  2. Seefeldt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Loney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Hite v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. United States v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. R. B. Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  3. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. Collier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  5. United States v. KratzDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API