United States v. McKinley County, NM
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ORDER
Before BALDOCK, Circuit Judge, CONWAY, Chief District Judge, and MECHEM, Senior District Judge. * PER CURIAM.. Backed by court-approved consent decrees, Plaintiff United States has kept careful watch over the electoral process of McKinley County, New Mexico, for the past ten years. Plaintiff now asserts that ten additional years of federal intervention into McKinley County’s electoral process is warranted due to continuing violations of the Voting Rights Act’s minority language assistance requirements. To that .end, Plaintiff seeks entry of a “Second Amended Consent Decree and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Sandoval County, NmDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2016