Legal Opinion
Ohio Fuel Supply Co. v. Paxton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 25, 1924No. 266PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
The question for decision is raised by the answer of the treasurer of Wayne county. The correctness of the conclusion reached in City Railway Co. v. Beard (D. C.) 283 Fed. 313, 20 Ohio L. R. 213, is not questioned. The situation of the parties is the same as in that case, excepting as to the difference in the valuation fixed on plaintiffs’ property with reference to its actual value and the amount of tax assessed against the same, and excepting that the Beard Case was disposed of on the pleadings, w'her^as in the instant case the facts material to a decision are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Post v. SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gay Union Corporation v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Ronald Mosley v. Captain MoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Tax Commission of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1927
- Mastrangelo v. State Council of ParksNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Gay Union Corporation v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.