Legal Opinion

Stilp v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

927 A.2d 707 (2007)

Gene STILP, Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, General Assembly, Robert C. Jubelirer, and John M. Perzel, Leadership of the General Assembly, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted on Briefs April 13, 2007.

Decided July 3, 2007.

Gene Stilp, petitioner, pro se.

Thomas W. Dymek, Philadelphia, for respondents.

BEFORE: COLINS, Judge, and SIMPSON, Judge, and KELLEY, Judge.

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.

In this original jurisdiction matter, a resident taxpayer challenges on constitutional grounds an amendment to Article XIV of The County Code,[1] known as Act 57 of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API