Wilcox Silver Plate Co. v. Schimmel
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Muskegon. (Bussell, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The complainant, as a creditor of defendants, filed its bill of complaint, alleging therein, among other things, that the firm of L. W. Schimmel & Co. was composed of Louis W. Schimmel, George E. Lovejoy and Frank Showerman, and was engaged in dealing in crockery, glassware, cutlery and silver-plated ware, at Muskegon, Michigan; that the firm became indebted to the Muskegon National Bank, and to secure such indebtedness, they executed, on the fifteenth day of Apyil, 1884, a chattel mortgage on their stock of goods; that afterwards the firm made and executed a chattel mortgage to Louis…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Morris v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. SpaldingNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Romeyn v. CaplisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Nichols v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Mead v. NorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carnahan v. CarnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Hoefs v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Terry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Thistlethwaite v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.