Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Lemp

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The motion to expunge the certificate of evidence from the record is based upon the suggestion that the ■court, at a subsequent term, was without jurisdiction to extend the time for filing the same even though the extension was granted within the original time allowed. The motion must be denied for the reasons stated in Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors’ Mut. Aid & Ben. Ass’n v. Leonard, 166 Ill. 154, and Spiehs v. Insull, 278 Ill. 184.

This is a proceeding by defendant under section 10 of the Dramshop Act [Cahill’s Ill. St. ch. 43; j[ 74(10)] to subject certain premises alleged to have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Millard v. MillardIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mutual Aid & Benefit Ass'n v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Garrity v. EigerIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Spiehs v. InsullIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Wing v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API