Surface Ex Rel. Surface v. Ranger Insurance Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
In this action, plaintiff seeks construction of the “uninsured motorist” provisions of an automobile liability policy issued by defendant Ranger Insurance Company. The appeal is here upon an agreed statement of facts in lieu of a transcript, as provided by Rule 81.13, Y.A.M.R., and therefore the only question before us is whether or not the trial court drew the proper legal conclusion from the facts stipulated. State ex rel. Ciba Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. State Tax Commission, 882 S.W.2d 645, 651[1] (Mo. banc 1964); Browning v. City of Poplar Bluff, 370 S.W.2d 179, 182[8]…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Brugioni v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Central Surety & Insurance v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Schroeder Ex Rel. Schroeder v. HorackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Cano v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. BroadieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Transit Casualty Co. in Receivership v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.