Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Allard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1987No. 86-534PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

The plaintiff seeks a new trial on damages, because the Superior Court (.Pappagianis, J.) refused to allow plaintiff’s counsel to comment on the defendant’s failure to offer the testimony of a doctor whose deposition had been videotaped. We affirm.

The plaintiff, Marion Kerr, injured her knee when she fell in an icy parking lot owned by the defendant, Raymond Allard, who was responsible for its maintenance. On the issue of damages, expert opinion evidence was crucial in determining the extent to which the injury resulted from the fall rather than from a prior tobogganing accident.

Prior to jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodman v. PeckSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  2. Baker v. Salvation Army, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  3. Brito v. Newmarket Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  4. Lee v. HustisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  5. Beardsell v. Tilton SchoolSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bohm v. Horsley Co. (In Re Groggel)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API