Legal Opinion

Winston v. Longshore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1906No. 15,722PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; John St. Paul, Judge. Action by J. M. Winston against F. A. Longshore & Co. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover $4,000 unduly paid. The petition represents that in February, 1904, plaintiff bought, through defendant, 400 bales of cotton futures, and had to his credit on the books of defendant $9,600; that he instructed defendant that he would not stand, at any time, any loss beyond the margin to his credit; and that he “must hedge when margin about exhausted.”

The petition further represents that of the amount which petitioner had to his credit he drew down $6,000, leaving a balance of margins to his credit of $3,600, and that defendant, contrary to his instructions,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kohlmeyer and Company v. SobertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Estes v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API