Legal Opinion

Garland v. Riebe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1922No. Appeal, No. 116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 116, Oct. T., 1921, by petitioner, from judgment of O. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1920, No. 62, overruling demurrer and setting aside alternative writ of mandamus, in tbe case of Charlotte Garland v. Louis Riebe, President of the Board of School Directors of the School District of the Borough of Lansford. Petition for mandamus to compel payment of salary as kindergarten teacher.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 116, Oct. T., 1921, by petitioner, from judgment of O. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1920, No. 62, overruling demurrer and setting aside alternative writ of mandamus, in tbe case of Charlotte Garland v. Louis Riebe, President of the Board of School Directors of the School District of the Borough of Lansford. Petition for mandamus to compel payment of salary as kindergarten teacher. Before Barber, P. J. The facts are stated in the following opinion of the court below: This is a petition by a public school teacher asking that an alternative writ of mandamus issue, directed to the…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

■ Every phase of the question involved is thoroughly considered and rightly decided in the opinion of the court below, which will be published in full in the report of this case.

For the reasons therein given the decree is affirmed.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Potts v. Penn Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ricapito v. Bethlehem School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Walters v. TopperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Ickes v. CostlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Foresman v. Gregg TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API