Legal Opinion

Markley v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. H. Lovett, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

On December 22, 1897, we reversed a judgment of the county court of Cook county in favor of appellee, confirming a special assessment upon the property of appellant for curbing, grading and paving Calumet avenue from Fifty-first street to Fifty-fifth street, in the city of Chicago, because the estimate of the cost of said proposed improvement was not made by the same persons named in the ordinance as commissioners, and we thereupon remanded the cause to said court for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice should appertain. On February 5,1898, appellant, after due notice to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Carlyle v. County of ClintonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City of East St. Louis v. AlbrechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People ex rel. Talbot Paving Co. v. City of PontiacIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Village of Morgan Park v. GahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. HulbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Geneseo v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Chicago v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Goodrich v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API