Legal Opinion
Hercules Co. v. Royal Indemnity Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 1959PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This action, tried by the Court without a jury, involves the construction of a policy of liability insurance issued by the defendant.
There was no substantial dispute as to the facts. The Court finds the following facts:
1. Plaintiff was and is a New Jersey Corporation. Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of insurance with its home office in New York City. The amount in controversy exceeds $3,-000.
2. In the regular course of its business, defendant issued to plaintiff a comprehensive general liability policy on September 8, 1952 through its duly authorized…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Berger Bros. Electric Motors, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Mason-Moore-Tracy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kissel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Nielson v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
- John P. McNally and Tom McNally D/B/A McNally Elevator Service Company, Plaintiff's-Appellees v. American States Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Swillie v. General Motors CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Electronic Purification Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.