Legal Opinion

State v. Wild

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 29, 1996No. 15093PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a/ and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.1 2 On appeal, the defendant asserts that the trial court (1) improperly admitted evidence of prior misconduct as relevant to the issue of proof of the defendant’s intent, and (2) failed to give limiting jury instructions at the time the constancy of accusation witnesses testified. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury could have reasonably found…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. FalbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. MorowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. DowneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. State v. Daniel W. E.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. State v. CepedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. State v. ErhardtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. State v. DeJesusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API