Legal Opinion

Neustadter Foundation v. Bernfeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the answer of the defendants herein and to grant to the plaintiff summary judgment to foreclose the mortgage as demanded in the complaint. The plaintiff, on or about March 31, 1914, acquired by assignment from the Lawyers Mortgage Company the mortgage sought to be foreclosed herein, payment of which was guaranteed by the Lawyers Mortgage Company under a policy of guaranty. On or about January 29, 1934, the Elarem Corporation, the owner of the mortgaged premises, assigned the rentals to the Lawyers Mortgage Company to secure existing interest and tax delinquencies.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Prudence Co. v. 160 West Seventy-Third Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Moulton v. . CornishNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Vought v. LevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 6820 Ridge Realty, L. L. C. v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Mortgage Commission Realty Corp. v. Columbia Heights Garage Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Myers v. LeedyIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Myers v. LeedyIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. U.S. Bank National Association v. HaskinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API