Legal Opinion

Department of Social & Health Services v. Hamm

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 16, 2005No. Nos. 52643-0-I; 52684-7-I; 53141-7-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Marissa Hamm appeals the trial court’s order terminating parental rights to her son, J.H., and her daughter, S.H. The trial court concluded Hamm was unwilling to appreciate the significant risk her relationship with S.H.’s father posed to J.H. and S.H. Hamm contends the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) failed to meet its burden of proving that (1) all services capable of correcting Hamm’s parental deficiencies were provided, (2) there is little likelihood conditions will be remedied in the near future, (3) continuation of her relationship diminishes prospects for integration…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. DhaliwalWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Department of Social & Health Services v. Saint-LouisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Davis v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Dep Of Sls, Calvin Turner v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. HammCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Dependency Of C.t. Karina Torrescano-hernandez v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API