Legal Opinion

Cripps v. Larsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1988No. A039727PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that a devise to two siblings lapsed because they predeceased the testator and left no issue, and their shares passed to the other devisees in proportion to those devisees’ other interests in the estate. Claudia Larsen appeals from an order determining entitlement to distribution of the estate of Ethel lone Begley. We reverse.

Begley died in 1985. She had executed a holographic will in 1960. The will stated, “All of my real estate and personal property is to sold and be divided share and share alike between my two Sisters Lulu L Bolton, Lena S Ford, and one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Estate of McCurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Lombardi v. BloisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Carpenter v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of BegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API